By Chris Snellgrove | Published
When Thor: Love and fame I’m out, disappointed like many Marvel fans who were looking for more weird, cozy vibes Thor: Ragnarok. Of course, director Taika Waititi’s second superhero effort isn’t nearly as good Ragnarokbut it’s not nearly as bad as the haters make it out to be. And as I was re-reading the old Thor comics, it occurred to me that this film is much better than its reputation and much better than other MCU films that didn’t get as much heat from fans.
Following Ragnarok
First, let’s start with a hard fact: the critics probably agree with that Thor: Love and fame it was a disappointing follow-up film. On Rotten Tomatoes, Love and Fame it averages 63 percent, which means it’s dangerously close to being… rotten. Currently, Ragnarok ascended to the Asgardian throne with a 93 percent priority score. If these two films were young gods still attending school in Asgard, Ragnarok It can be a student award while Love and Fame it can be a class character who doesn’t pass a class well, let alone an assignment.
I’m taking the Band-Aid off right now because I don’t want any of you to think I mean it Love and Fame you are better than Ragnarokeffortlessly blended comedy and action while relying heavily on Chris Hemsworth’s comedic chops (turned out to be as advanced as his other muscles). However, this fourth Thor movie is much better than Thor 2a film that managed to simultaneously ruin the talents of Chris Eccleston and Natalie Portman. For that reason, Taika Waititi deserves full credit for bringing Portman back to the MCU in such a dramatic way Love and Fame.
Compared to Iron Man 3
Additionally, while I personally love the film (Shane Black can do no wrong in my eyes), Iron Man 3 is considered the first man of the MCU, many fans who are insulting (among other things) the portrayal of the Mandarin. Common criticism of Thor: Love and fame include that it’s very likable, but ask yourself: are the few jokes in this film friendlier than Ben Kingsley’s terrorist mastermind portrayed as a junkie? Moreover, I have to admit that too Love and Fame it has a definite structure (albeit an uneven tone) while Iron Man 3The plot is a convoluted waste.
And, while this is obviously completely coincidental, I can’t help but feel like Waititi’s big, creative twist Thor: Love and fame led to more memorable moments than we’ve had with modern Marvel movies. Like, the squealing goats are annoying and the whole “Jane has cancer” plot was a bit over the top, but almost the entire plot of this Asgardian adventure was more memorable than anything I saw in it. Black Widow or Shang-Chi. And this Thor movie will probably leave you smiling and happy…just compare that to movies like that Quantumania that leaves you confused or Forever that just puts you to sleep.
Not Perfect But Not Bad
Again, none of this means Thor: Love and fame it’s a flawless movie…it’s a real mess, and things like Jane’s death and Gorr’s tragic backstory seem crazy next to scenes of Chris Hemsworth getting undressed. But I can’t help but grade the films on all their merits (my job really!), and it turns out that a bunch of mixed but memorable scenes add up to a memorable and (more importantly) fun movie. The fact that I didn’t have to watch anything on Disney+ for “homework” before opening the cake is icing on the cake.
If you decide to visit again Thor: Love and fameyou may find it a refreshing break from the endless carnage of holiday plans. Also, if you’re disappointed with the modern Marvel out there Deadpool and Wolverineit’s nice to go back to a better comic book classic than you remember. If we can accept that Tony Stark is flawed but brilliant, it’s time to accept that about Thor’s much-maligned cinematic outing.
Thor: Love and fame is available to stream on Disney+.
Source link
