The intellectuals need to stop clamoring for their favorite old shows to come back.
By Chris Snellgrove | Updated
That’s no secret X files released at the right time. Even as the show built a growing public interest in conspiracies and cover-ups, it became popular on the nascent World Wide Web, where veteran Internet fans helped shape the show’s direction. I was part of that early fandom, and no one was as excited as I was at the time X files it was brought back for a television revival in 2016. However, the terrible quality of these two new seasons taught me an important lesson: nerds need to stop clamoring for their favorite old shows to come back.
The revival of X files it didn’t happen in a vacuum. It was part of a series of televised revivals that included everything from the show Full house to Frasier. Plus, it was part of the stressful entertainment industry where it seems like every new show or movie has to be a sequel, prequel, spinoff, or revival. That trend will last because audiences often enjoy returning to their favorite IPs (think of them as comfort food for entertainment), but the medium X-Files the revival is proof that some of our favorites need to stay in the past, intact and preserved in the amber of nostalgia.
Initially, the X-Files revival seemed to be returning to form. After all, for fans who remember that Mulder was completely absent last season and half of the show, it was nice to see David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson back on screen for something that wasn’t a lackluster series finale or a weird sequel. The X-Files: I Want to Believe. But it didn’t take long for the revival to bring back dead characters, rehash old stories, and generally turn the franchise into something Flukeman would swim in the toilet with.
The result was the worst of both worlds… a revival that nullified much of what came before as it introduced new stories that quickly became series lows. We really needed you More Scully’s pregnancy drama or the strange revelation that her son William was secretly Mulder’s brother? Instead of dominating the fandom of previous seasons, the revival just reminds us that it’s a mixed bag X files It really was when it came to consistency and quality.
When I made peace with the failure of this revival, I began to see it X files it was not an isolated failure. In fact, its failure was as inevitable as change itself. The cast, creators, and fans had changed quite a bit since the premiere, but our collective need for nostalgia ensured that Chris Carter tried to repeat those earlier episodes, successfully trying to tell the stories of the ’90s in 2016. the change of the fandom that had changed, and its revival has done nothing but illuminate all the narrative battles of our favorite conspiracies. the exhibition.
The same need to sell yesterday’s ideas to today’s diverse audiences has doomed several other revivals, including That 90s Show again Frasier. Both of those shows tried to remake their old formulas despite losing key cast members. Frasier it’s great because Kelsey Grammer is the only original cast member to return in a meaningful way. For me personally, there was no interest in watching this talented actor perform without the support of the ’90s best comedic ensemble (suck it, Seinfeld).
However, we are thankful for failure X files revival, and I knew what to do about my hatred Frasier update: ignore it in favor of just streaming the original show. The old episodes of all your favorite series are still available, and they will definitely be better than anywhere the tired restart or revival that the network throws out when it runs out of ideas.
In addition, by ignoring these hot updates, we can send a strong message to those networks that we are looking for new ideas and not tired, old ones. You don’t have to meet a shady government informant or face outside monsters to successfully send this message. What you need to do is the last thing the networks expect: turn off the TV until there’s something worth watching.
Source link
