By TeeJay Small | Published
Warner Bros. has been under fire from mainstream audiences for the past few years, thanks to a series of decisions from the top that seem to spit in the face of filmmakers and consumers everywhere. As you may know, the studio shelved a series of long-awaited classic films that were completely finished and ready for release, stripped many popular projects from their studios, and generally gave the WGA and SAG-AFTRA unions an incredibly hard time. during last year’s joint strikes. Now, according to The Guardian, Warner Bros has bowed to Clint Eastwood’s success. Judge #2by banning the film from wide release throughout the United States.
Juror #2 Will Not Receive Wide Exclusion
The situation with Warner Bros. and Judge #2 It’s very strange, since the film should be a big winner for the studio, at least on paper. The film features writing and direction by a respected filmmaker who has worked in Hollywood for decades, an eye-catching cast, and a shocking story centered on a family man working as a judge, overseeing a crime he may have committed. .
Despite these positive indications, David Zaslav and company seem committed to preventing the film from succeeding at the box office, by restricting it to less than 50 theaters in the country.
Warner Bros. Buries The Clint Eastwood Movie
Despite the slow pace of the Judge #2 in American theatres, the film has already opened in over 300 cinemas across the UK. Given the unique American presentation of the film, it seems strange that Warner Bros. would alienate such a large part of the film. Judge #2Potential audience. To make matters worse, it appears that the studio won’t even submit the movie for Oscar consideration, showing a general lack of faith in the film’s proposed performance.
Warner Bros also took the strange and almost unprecedented step of choosing to blur the box office earnings. Judge #2. Such a practice is almost exclusively done for movies that play for the first time directly on the stream. To an outside observer, these steps look like damage control from a studio that has absolutely no faith in the success or quality of their project- but what could put Warner Bros. so scared of this film?
Eastwood’s long career has been churning out financially successful hits, even if they lack critical acclaim, so there should be no reason for Warner Bros. to show such a lack of confidence. Judge #2. Perhaps the filmmaker, who is 94, has internal problems with management at Warner Bros, and his film is being punished for it. This idea has been floated by fans ever since Eastwood refused to attend Judge #2It’s the first premiere, although neither team has said anything to confirm the existence of the behind-the-scenes beef.
Clint Eastwood’s Last Movie
However, many fans seem to believe that Judge #2 will be Clint Eastwood’s last, considering his age, which means the film should definitely be treated with a certain level of respect. Whether you’re a fan of Eastwood’s work or not, it should ring alarm bells that Warner Bros. is handling his financial investment. Judge #2 so bad. This serves as one of a long list of examples that paint Warner Bros. as a dysfunctional, money-driven outfit led by small investors who have little understanding of the art or the film business as a whole.
Source: The Guardian
Source link
